-
The Minutes of the previous meeting were approved, and the Resolutions
signed.
|
-
Charles Russell, Solicitors, had received 107 applications for
compensation to date. Including the cases that would be considered
today, 96 have been before the Trustees.
|
- The
importance of applicants identifying the victim's other family
members and carers was discussed, and a failure to do so could
lead to delay in compensation being paid.
|
- Charles
Russell reported that the website was being updated. The Main
Application Form had been amended, and the Guidance Note for Compensation
had been revised. Both of these would be added to the website.
|
- There
was a general discussion about the complexity of the scheme. The
claims took considerable time to work and prepare, and progress
in determining claims depended on the quality of the information
provided in the application.
|
- The
Trustees would consider at the next meeting whether it would be
necessary to take further steps, such as instructing an enquiry
agent, to try to locate an estranged parent in cases where other
avenues of enquiry had failed.
|
- Urgent
applications for compensation were considered.
|
- The
outstanding issues in 14 cases that had been previously considered
by the Trustees were considered.
|
- The
Trustees considered 4 new cases.
|
- The
Quarterly Report of the CJD Surveillance Unit was discussed.
|
-
It was agreed that further cases, the Annual Report, and the meaning
of 'hardship' in relation to claims for an identifiable psychiatric
condition would be considered at the next meeting on 14 March
2003.
|
Previous
Meeting 
|
Next
Meeting |